True or False: A verbal waiver of Miranda rights is as strong as a written waiver.

The assertion that a verbal waiver of Miranda rights is as strong as a written waiver is considered false because a written waiver generally provides clearer evidence of a suspect's understanding and acceptance of their rights. A written waiver serves as documentation that can be referenced later in legal proceedings, demonstrating the suspect's consent in a tangible form that is less subject to interpretation.

A verbal waiver, while still valid if it is clear and voluntarily given, can sometimes lead to ambiguity regarding the suspect's comprehension of the rights being waived. In court, the circumstances surrounding the verbal waiver may be scrutinized more heavily than a written waiver, as it relies on the officer’s account and the context in which the waiver occurred. Thus, written waivers are often viewed as more reliable in ensuring that the suspect has knowingly and intelligently waived their rights.