How is interrogation defined within the meaning of the Miranda decision?

Interrogation, as defined in the context of the Miranda decision, specifically refers to questioning that is intended to elicit a self-incriminating response from an individual. This distinction is important because the Miranda rights are designed to protect individuals from being compelled to provide information that could incriminate them during custodial interrogation. The ruling emphasizes that individuals must be informed of their rights, such as the right to remain silent and the right to legal counsel, when faced with such questioning. The legal framework established by this decision aims to ensure that any statements made by a suspect during an interrogation are voluntary and made with an understanding of the implications, particularly regarding self-incrimination.

The other options do not capture this precise legal definition. General questioning by law enforcement encompasses a range of inquiries that may not necessarily seek self-incriminating information, while public interviews and informal discussions do not pertain to the formal context of custodial interrogation that triggers Miranda rights.